Looking for more hands-on guidance from your software development partner?
How popular are they?
With Google’s financial backing and a large community of developers, Angular may be the most popular of the three right now. It has an impressive 165,000 followers on Twitter. It also happens to be the oldest as it was first released in October 2010. You’ll find it on big websites like those belonging to ABC News, Intel, and Walgreens.
React has fewer Twitter followers, at 93,500, but it’s backed by social media giant Facebook. You’ll find it on very popular websites like Airbnb, Feedly, and Netflix. First launched in March 2013, it’s also the youngest of the three frameworks.
There’s no major organization behind Ember, but it does have an active community. Since it was first released in December 2011, it has made its way onto many popular websites, including Chipotle, Groupon, and Vine. Its Twitter follower count is just 35,200.
We find that around 60% of our clients use Angular, 30% use React, and the remaining 10% use Ember. The major backing that Angular and React have definitely contributes to their popularity and ensures that they’ll be well funded for the immediate future. Having said that, each framework has its own pros and cons.
Why pick Angular?
If your project is going out on desktop and mobile applications, then Angular is a great fit. Large enterprises will also like the fact that it’s written in Microsoft TypeScript. However, the update to Angular version 2.0 has left some users behind and the documentation leaves a lot to be desired.
Quick pros: MVC architecture, easy to customize DOM, two-way data bindings, extendable HTML directories, support for desktop and mobile apps, built-in dependency injection, support for server-side rendering, easy to build and deploy with AngularCLI tool.
Why choose React?
If you need high performance and simple libraries, rather than a complete MV* framework, then React could be the best pick for you. The trouble is that you’ll have to employ a third-party framework like Flux or Redux alongside it to create a full MV* architecture.
Quick pros: Virtual DOM, one-way binding, support for desktop and mobile apps, support for server-side rendering, fast performance.
Why pick Ember?
Projects that strictly follow the namespace/convention over configuration, like Ruby on Rails projects, will work well with Ember, but it’s held back by the relatively small community which can make it difficult to go beyond common uses.
Quick pros: MVC architecture, two-way data bindings, fits well with RoR model and apps, built-in dependency injection, easy to build and deploy with EmberCLI tool, quick to develop.
Ultimately, all three frameworks are solid and they all boast the features and functions that you’re likely to need, but there are some important differences. Hopefully our quick look at the pros will help you narrow down your choice.
Phong Bui is Vice President of Technology for KMS